Ever notice that all of the Democrat and a few of the Republican candidates for President use the word “negotiate” within the first five words of their answer when confronted with a question on terrorism? You may ask “what is the matter with that?” The problem with negotiating with terrorist organizations is not a matter of morals but one of practicality which is a twin edged sword.

One the first edge of the sword you have to remember the first rule of negotiating, which is: You have to have something the other party wants and the other party has to have something you want. What do terrorist want that we have? The answer is simple, nothing. Religious freedom, economic freedom, political freedom even the freedom of speech. These freedoms we have go against their view of “Gods Will” and must be stopped thus the “Jihad“ or Holy War.

What do they have that we want? The simple answer again is nothing. We do not want an Islamic Theocracy, I don’t care what ideology you have, an Islamic theocracy is not in your best interest.

Do you think Muslim Clerics who would control everything will allow a woman to have an abortion regardless of circumstances? Do you think Muslim Clerics will allow a woman to get a job, get a divorce from her abusive husband, have a same sex lover, rent a car, motel room, own a home or business?

The other edge of the “practicality sword” as I have dubbed it is “how do you trust the word of a terrorist? You can’t, they blow up buildings, markets and other venues with innocent people in them to force people whom they disagree into accepting their religion and beliefs.

      As we enter another election cycle the "A" word will be brought up time and time again, the "A" word is the American Holocaust. I'm of course refereing to abortion. I know, I know it's a woman's right to choose or is it? First of all the Roe versus Wade decision says nothing about a woman's right to choose, the decision incorrectly states that an abortion is a private matter between a woman and her physician.
      Second a Woman does not have the "right to choose", if we were going to use that argument then Women could argue that they have the choice between using illegal narcotics or not using illegal narcotics, after all it's her body to do with as she wishes. Wearing a seat belt when in a vehicle, if she wants to be ejected through the windshield that's her choice.
      If women have the "right to choose" why don't men have the same "right" as women? We don't because women don't have that right either. As for a "private matter" between a woman and her physician, this isn't a valid argument either because a private matter could easily mean "Doctor, I am a miserable failure in life please kill me." Or "Doctor I am going to kill the President of the United States tomorrow and I need some valium to calm my nerves."
      The Doctor is by law required to inform authorities if a patient makes such a claim, so much for the "private matter" of a woman and her physician argument. Another argument American Holocaust supporters like to use is "an unborn fetus is a parasite that a woman has the "right" to have surgically removed at her discretion."
     Ok let's explore that chain of thought, I remember reading some of the NAZI propaganda from the 1930's and 40's and the Nazi party said the same thing about the jews being parasites of  the world and needed to be eradicated thus the original Holocaust was born. So it's axiomatic  to believe the unborn fetus is a parasite to be eliminated at will is to believe that the Germans of WWII had the "right" to kill over six million jews.
     Now let's examine the social/ecomomic consequences of the American Holocaust. Since "choice" is invalid as an argument because choice in this context is a detriment to society as a whole. Illegal narcotics are a detriment to society and so is not wearing your seat belt because of the danger to all of us, in the illegal narcotics example the crimes associated with them.
      Another social consequence is the devaluing of human life, murder becomes a more acceptable choice to resolve problems, euthanasia  becomes more acceptable to rid ourselves of the aged or infirm. The ecomomic consequences are not any prettier.
     While true it costs money to raise "unwanted" children the long term effects is the decimating of our future labor pool. Take France and Germany for example The French and Germans MUST bring in foreign workers from the middle east to take menial labor jobs because abortion has decimated their labor pools.
     The end result is the people and governments of these two particular countries quake in fear of middle eastern terrorism should they consider any policy that is not in the best interest of the middle east because of the sheer number of immigrants from that region.
     We here in the United States are starting to see the same results but instead of terrorism being the problem it is illegal immigration from South America which is another blog topic.
     Of course there is the moral issues associated with the American Holocaust. If you believe the Nazi's American inspired elimination of the worlds Jews just because they were Jewish was an immoral act, then logic dictates that the elimination of the unborn just because they can't defend themselves is also immoral. 

By Victor Kerr.

      The website announcement of Hillary Rodham Clinton's run for the top job, Casa Blanca, White House or more simply the Presidency of the United States should be no surprise to anyone. Nor should the quest for one hundred million dollars just to begin her campaign.
      Do I have a problem with Hillary Clinton running for President? In honest truth the answer is yes I do. No not because she is a woman (Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is far more qualified), democrat, Maoist or any other factor other then she is Hillary Clinton. Yes my opposition to Hillary's campaign is personal.
     Hillary Clinton's lust for power is the scariest scenario I can imagine and he's why: In Barbara Olson's book "Hell To Pay" . Mrs.Olson (Killed September 11 2001 when the plane she was passenger in crashed into the Pentagon) wrote the in depth and accurate profile of Hillary Clinton which Mrs. Olson backs up with reams of documentation. Olsons book alone leads me to believe that Hillary is not only wrong for the country but dangerous.
     However I am not depending on just one National Bestseller for my information, there is also the actions of Hillary Clinton that are alarming. Her "stand by her man" philosophy by what her sycophant supporters call "The worlds smartest woman" is in it's self alarming. Why would the worlds smartest woman stay with a husband who sleeps with every woman he thinks he's entitled too?
      The answer is simple, William Jefferson Clinton former President of the United States is her best and most direct path the the White House. Hillary did more then just stand by her man, she knowingly and with utter ruthlessness ran the "nuts and sluts" campaign that tried to varying degrees of success to discredit any woman that threatened her husbands administration.
      Then consider her run for the U.S Senate in 2000, why would the smartest woman in the world give up as much as ten million dollars a year as a New York Attorney for a job that pays less then ten percent of what she could have made? Could she be positioning herself as a possible candidate for President?
     Do you remember Craig Livingston the bar bouncer that no one remembers hiring? The over nine hundred raw F.B. I. files that he and Hillary had in their possession for over two years? What could they be doing with that many files? Could they be scanning those files to disc for a future Hillary Presidential campaign?
     John Kerry should know about this better then anyone, after all excerpts from is service in Vietnam some how got leaked to the press despite Kerry's refusal to release those records. Why would Hillary sabotage a fellow democrat's campaign?
      That's easy to answer, if John Kerry had won she couldn't have very well run against him on 2008 and waiting for the 2012 election cycle would have been unbearable to a woman that has waited and positioned herself, her entire adult life for this chance.
     My advise to the other candidates for President both Democrat and Republican is find those raw F.B.I. files and wrestle them away from Hillary because I guarantee anything in those files will be used against you in the most ruthless and embarrassing manner.